<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rampant Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theinnovationdiaries.com/2008/03/27/rampant-innovation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theinnovationdiaries.com/2008/03/27/rampant-innovation/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Joey</title>
		<link>http://www.theinnovationdiaries.com/2008/03/27/rampant-innovation/#comment-1151</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theinnovationdiaries.com/2008/03/27/rampant-innovation/#comment-1151</guid>
		<description>So is fixing problems incrementally not really innovation? It's impossible to understand what problems we don't really get yet (known knowns and unknown knowns) so people can be happy with innovation that just solves their gripes, rather than fixes a problem they never knew existed. Eventually could the "fixing things" style of innovation hit a brick wall and only the "what is new with the new" will be interesting at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is fixing problems incrementally not really innovation? It&#8217;s impossible to understand what problems we don&#8217;t really get yet (known knowns and unknown knowns) so people can be happy with innovation that just solves their gripes, rather than fixes a problem they never knew existed. Eventually could the &#8220;fixing things&#8221; style of innovation hit a brick wall and only the &#8220;what is new with the new&#8221; will be interesting at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
